Hi Thomas Lets forget about java.util, what about simple arrays ?
It seems that we already have java [] array -> JS Array marshalling. And It would be very nice if we had these type of marshalling with zero performance penalty: java byte[] -> Int8ArrayNative java short[] -> Int16ArrayNative java float[] -> FloatArrayNative Currently, there is no way of writing GWT compatible portable code that operates with byte[] short[] int[] float[] without java array[] -> JS TypedArray performance issues -K On Friday, June 10, 2016 at 10:27:58 AM UTC+3, Thomas Broyer wrote: > > Except that there is NO marshaling! There are so many cases where it just > won't work that it's not even worth trying if you ask me.You > > need to think about isNative vs. "exported" types, method return values > vs. parameters vs. fields (which can be both get and set); object > identities (calling the getter twice in your example, should it return the > same "wrapper" instance? I can already see people complain if that's not > the case) > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
