This makes sense for newer projects maybe. I already have a codebase and making trampolines to convert collections and maps to arrays and don't know what is a terrifying option.
I prefer to depend on gwt-jackson (which doesn't work for me - resty-gwt works - resty-gwt is switching to gwt-jackson - eventually gwt-jackson will work for me) especially if I am using jackson already in the server, On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Ignacio Baca Moreno-Torres < [email protected]> wrote: > IMHO supporting the whole collection frameworks is just an unnecessary > complication. Just use plain array, not generics need, and now that stream > are supported in GWT you has no excuse to use arrays. The inheritance is > not solved in JsInterop for now, just try to avoid. > > On Friday, August 19, 2016 at 3:38:28 PM UTC+2, Vassilis Virvilis wrote: >> >> How about transmitting nested Collections, Map, complex inheritance and >> generics? >> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 4:30 PM, zakaria amine <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I also tried to convert back to the original object: >>> >>> @JsType(isNative=true, namespace=GLOBAL) >>> public class JSON { >>> public native static String stringify(Object obj); >>> public native static Object parse(String obj); >>> >>> } >>> >>> and then: >>> //.... >>> >>> Record converted = (Record) JSON.parse(json); >>> >>> and it works just fine. why would we need something like gwt-jackson >>> anymore? >>> >>> >>> Le vendredi 19 août 2016 12:05:32 UTC+2, zakaria amine a écrit : >>>> >>>> It works. I prefer your solution. >>>> >>>> Le vendredi 19 août 2016 11:51:35 UTC+2, Jens a écrit : >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Am Freitag, 19. August 2016 11:43:12 UTC+2 schrieb zakaria amine: >>>>>> >>>>>> I have tried something like: >>>>>> >>>>>> @JsType(namespace=GLOBAL) >>>>>> public class Record { >>>>>> String id; >>>>>> String date; >>>>>> String data; >>>>>> public Record() { >>>>>> } >>>>>> } >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> By default @JsType property "isNative" is false, so your Record class >>>>> is a non-native class that might get exported to JS if you use >>>>> -generateJsInteropExports during compilation. If you don't use that flag >>>>> the @JsType is treated as a normal class I guess. >>>>> >>>>> You should use @JsType(isNative=true, namespace=GLOBAL, >>>>> name="Object") so that your Record class becomes a plain JavaScript object >>>>> >>>>> -- J. >>>>> >>>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "GWT Users" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Vassilis Virvilis >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "GWT Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Vassilis Virvilis -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
