I got an extra 10% speed boost by adjusting my Sun JDK 6.0 JVM settings: -client -Xms512m -Xmx512m -Xss128k -Xverify:none -XX:PermSize=32m - XX:MaxPermSize=32m -XX:AllocatePrefetchLines=4 - Djava.awt.headless=true
For a single browser config the CLIENT VM is working better for me. A single permutation doesn't seem enough to let the server VM perform its optimisations. However, for my production builds for all browsers/ locales then server mode is king. On Feb 4, 4:41 am, Pham Tran Quoc Viet <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi,What is the value for Chrome browser? I tried this, but it crashed. > Thanks. > > <inherits name='com.google.gwt.user.User'/> > <inherits name='com.google.gwt.user.UserAgent'/> > <set-property name='user.agent' value='chrome'/> > > Here is the crash: > [ERROR] Unable to get value of property 'user.agent' > com.google.gwt.core.ext.BadPropertyValueException: Property 'user.agent' > cannot be set to unexpected value 'chrome' > at > com.google.gwt.dev.shell.ModuleSpacePropertyOracle.computePropertyValue(Mod > uleSpacePropertyOracle.java:114) > at > com.google.gwt.dev.shell.ModuleSpacePropertyOracle.getPropertyValue(ModuleS > pacePropertyOracle.java:59) > at > com.google.gwt.dev.cfg.ConditionWhenPropertyIs.doEval(ConditionWhenProperty > Is.java:48) > at com.google.gwt.dev.cfg.Condition.isTrue(Condition.java:36) > at com.google.gwt.dev.cfg.ConditionAll.doEval(ConditionAll.java:37) > at com.google.gwt.dev.cfg.Condition.isTrue(Condition.java:36) > at com.google.gwt.dev.cfg.Rule.isApplicable(Rule.java:35) > at > com.google.gwt.dev.shell.StandardRebindOracle$Rebinder.tryRebind(StandardRe > bindOracle.java:106) > at > com.google.gwt.dev.shell.StandardRebindOracle$Rebinder.rebind(StandardRebin > dOracle.java:61) > at > com.google.gwt.dev.shell.StandardRebindOracle.rebind(StandardRebindOracle.j > ava:166) > at > com.google.gwt.dev.shell.ShellModuleSpaceHost.rebind(ShellModuleSpaceHost.j > ava:114) > > Viet Pham > > On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Niklas Derouche <[email protected]> wrote: > > Well, for me it only generates the IE version and the time is down to about > > 40 percent. > > clean out the www folder before the compile perhaps? > > > n. > > > On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Pham Tran Quoc Viet < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > >> Hi,Great. That went through without error. How do you verify if only ie6 > >> version is created? I looked at the www folder and saw a bunch of html > >> files > >> whose names are some_random_number.html > > >> The time it took to compile did not seem to improve either. Thanks. > > >> Viet Pham > > >> On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Niklas Derouche <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> Hi, > >>> try: > > >>> <inherits name='com.google.gwt.user.User'/> > >>> <inherits name='com.google.gwt.user.UserAgent'/> > >>> <set-property name='user.agent' value='ie6'/> > > >>> if you see what I mean. > > >>> n. > > >>> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Pham Tran Quoc Viet < > >>> [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>> Hi, > >>>> I followed the advise in this thread and added the following to my > >>>> module.gwt.xml: > >>>> <module> > >>>> <set-property name="user.agent" value="ie6" /> > >>>> <extend-property name="locale" values="en_US" /> > > >>>> <!-- Inherit required packages --> > >>>> ... > >>>> <!-- Style sheets --> > >>>> ... > >>>> <!-- Entry point --> > >>>> ... > >>>> </module> > > >>>> I got this error: > >>>> [ERROR] Property 'user.agent' not found > >>>> [ERROR] Failure while parsing XML > > >>>> Any ideas? Thanks. > >>>> Viet Pham > > >>>> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 12:10 AM, surfer <[email protected]>wrote: > > >>>>> many many thanks > >>>>> using <set-property name="user.agent" value="gecko" /> > >>>>> the time of compilation fell down from 3':10" to 1':37" > > >>>>> Lorenzo > > >>>>> On 8 Nov, 02:13, "Ian Petersen" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 6:06 PM, surfer <[email protected]> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > > since often the main development of an application is viewed and > >>>>> > > debugged with one single type of browser and only sometimes > >>>>> verified > >>>>> > > on the others, does anybody know if it's possible to force GWT > >>>>> > > compiler to build javascript code for just one single target > >>>>> browser, > >>>>> > > in order to increase compiling phase performance ? > > >>>>> > Yes it's possible. The answer lies behind this link: > >>>>>http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit/search?group=Google. > >>>>> .. > > >>>>> > Ian > > >>> -- > >>> ------------------------------------------------------- > >>> Ave bossa nova, similis bossa seneca > > > -- > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Ave bossa nova, similis bossa seneca --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
