Thanks a lot, Dop.
On Feb 4, 8:17 am, Tom Schindl <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dop Sun schrieb:
>
> > Thanks for your reply.
>
> > Just look the link you are given briefly, UFace is a great idea.
>
> > I guess in this forum, there are lot of discussions about what's the
> > best widget library to build the application on. Personally, I ever
> > used ExtGWT, because my colleagues are using ExtJS in their .NET
> > project, and this can provide the similar look & Feel. SmartGWT also
> > provides very creative and unique features. But the real problem we
> > are facing may be: if we commit to a framework, it's very hard to
> > switch to the other one (at least in the same project different
> > versions). I'm not go through details about UFace, and I guess it can
> > help on this?
>
> Yes it can. You can switch from technology to technology simply by
> switching the root-factory.
> We are just starting on a GWT port but an example switching between SWT
> and QT might make
> clear what I mean.
>
> SWT:
> public class Launcher {
> public static void main(String[] args) {
> final Display display = new Display();
>
> Realm.runWithDefault(SWTObservables.getRealm(display), new Runnable() {
> public void run() {
> JFaceFactory factory = new JFaceFactory();
> Workbench workbench = new Workbench(factory);
> workbench.open();
>
> while( ! workbench.isDisposed() ) {
> if( ! display.readAndDispatch() ) {
> display.sleep();
> }
> }
> }
> });
> }
>
> }
>
> QT:
> public class Launcher {
> public static void main(String[] args) {
> QApplication.initialize(new String[0]);
> QApplication.setStyle(new QCleanlooksStyle());
>
> Realm.runWithDefault(QTObservables.getRealm(), new Runnable() {
> public void run() {
> QTFactory factory = new QTFactory();
> Workbench workbench = new Workbench(factory);
> workbench.open();
> QApplication.exec();
> }
> });
> }
>
> }
>
> http://tom-eclipse-dev.blogspot.com/2009/01/getting-started-with-ufac...http://tom-eclipse-dev.blogspot.com/2009/01/pimp-your-application-l-w...
>
> In theory you could even mix different technologies but always using the
> the same Widget-API.
>
> The styling is done using a declarative markup (CSS, ....) so GWT is a
> perfect match on this I guess.
>
> Tom
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
