I have reviewed the docs again. And still I am unsure if I have modularized the JSInterop / GWT part properly. Why?
as of the example all generic classes are duplicated in the modules. Means if my non-modularized code has a size of about 500kByte I am now getting nearly the same size for each module. Let say I need to make 10 modules. In this case my codebase will explode to 5MByte of size. I cannot imagine that this is the "modularizing" approach of JSInterop. So I still assume I am doing something wrong. Can someone clarify? Am Montag, 21. November 2016 19:53:38 UTC+1 schrieb Ignacio Baca Moreno-Torres: > > This is an exaggerated comment, but... you know that nowadays most of the > pages uses various MB on each load, for example just opening apple store > downloads 2M, just click ipad goes up to 6M. So... em, hehe codespliting a > 1MB uncompressed JS (probably around 300k compressed) which is going to be > cached forever is not very good place to dedicate your effort ;). Obviously > is just an opinion. But the monolithic approach with the pretty nice unused > resources purge algorithm of GWT is even better now than 5 years ago (I > remark the 'purger' because you cannot purge if you do not compile the > whole app at once). And it even support code splitting if you goes up to > various MB of JS. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
