Do you have performance measurements ? Did the performance better for 2.7 ? Did you measured real transfer traffic (web server supports real-time GZ compression over HTTP) ?
Thanks On Thursday, November 24, 2016 at 3:46:49 PM UTC+3, Óscar Frías Barranco wrote: > > Hi. > > We are trying to move our website from GWT 2.7 to 2.8 but we have found > that GWT 2.8 generates code which is significantly heavier. > > For example, these are the sizes for one of the permutations: > GWT 2.7 + Closure Compiler: 590 KB > GWT 2.7 without Closure Compiler: 664 KB > GWT 2.8 (no Closure Compiler available): 674 KB > > So the difference between 2.7 and 2.8 is +14% code size. > > We would like to keep our site up to date with the last version of GWT but > we don't like increasing our website code in this manner because it means > higher downloads, higher waiting times, worse user experience, etc. > > Do you plan to bring Closure Compiler (-XenableClosureCompiler option) > back to GWT? It was very useful for us. > > Kind regards, > Oscar > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
