On Tuesday, May 9, 2017 at 12:33:57 PM UTC+2, Frederik Van Hoyweghen wrote:
>
> This indeed seems to be what I was looking for, thank you.
> Are there any obvious downsides to doing it like this, with multiple 
> executions?
>

Each module compilation will fork a new GWT compiler process, rather than 
use a single process compiling all modules (assuming that's how you're 
doing it in Ant), so it'll probably take more time (but possibly less 
memory).
That's all I can think of.
 

> Does it matter which specific moduleName I specify within the 
> <configuration> tag, or should I just pick 1 arbitrary one there and put 
> the others within the <executions> tag?
>

I wouldn't put any <moduleName> / <moduleShortName> into the plugin-level 
<configuration>, and only put them into the <executions>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to