Ok, according to the doc, the name:
> Customizes the name of the type in generated JavaScript. If not
> provided, the simple Java name will be used.
That means that for my case
@JsType(isNative = true, namespace = JsPackage.GLOBAL)
> public abstract class ArrayBuffer { ... }
This is equvavlent to (name = "ArrayBuffer"). Which was suggested above.
Right ?
I tried the following without any success:
> @JsType(isNative = true, namespace = JsPackage.GLOBAL, name =
> "ArrayBuffer")
JavaScriptObject jsType is stil null and checkcast failed.
But this works:
@JsType(isNative = true, namespace = JsPackage.GLOBAL, name = "Object")
In that case GWT calls castToJsObject, which does not do type checking,
instead of castToNative. castToNative does type checks.
However I still don`t think that name="Object" is correct for native
ArrayBuffer.
If I understand JsInterop correctly, when want to call a @JsConstructor
form java I must assign a proper name, right ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
