You're welcome. I've already been confronted with this problem and the GWT compiler is not verbose with this. I've find this information in a tutorial where these two conditions was exposed.
2009/2/8 marcelstoer <[email protected]> > > Thanks for your quick reply. > > On Feb 8, 5:37 pm, Damien Picard <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Your class has to implement the interface > > com.google.gwt.user.client.rpc.IsSerializable and you have to add a > > As of GWT 1.5 this is no longer required, implementing > java.io.Serializable is enough. > > > free-parameters constructor as is : > > > > public class MyClass implements IsSerializable{ > > > > public MyClass(){ > > ... > > } > > > > } > > > > Maybe this default constructor misses ? > > Yes, indeed. I totally forgot about the default constructor. Thanks > for pointing that out. java.lang.Class does have a no-args > constructor, but it's private. > > I just whish the GWT compiler were a little more verbose or precise > about the problem. > > Marcel > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
