And lets not forget that it is not so long since j2cl was made public.

On Thursday, February 20, 2020 at 1:00:33 PM UTC+2, Ahmad Bawaneh wrote:
>
> You dont need to maintain a separate branch or code base, you can use the 
> latest snapshot which is as stable as a release, i am pretty sure when 2.9 
> is release you will only need to switch version and everything still works, 
> if you can use the snapshot for some reason you can use the unofficial 
> release as discussed here 
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/google-web-toolkit/qmwiMVofhR8/discussion
>  or 
> you can fork and release internally.
>
> and the community work, we need to know that the active members in the 
> community is small, that is said we could have made a GWT3.0 a lot earlier, 
> we could have focused in shipping a working maven plugin for j2cl and call 
> the day, but most of the efforts is focused in making sure that old apps 
> will be able to migrate to gwt3.0 without much effort and this part in 
> specific is very important and very hard and consumes a lot of time, GWT 
> apps in general are big apps and making GWT3.0 that only works for new apps 
> only or requires app rewrite does not make any sense.
>
> to get more insight on what have been done check this list
>
> https://ci.vertispan.com/ 
>
> On Wednesday, February 19, 2020 at 3:21:03 PM UTC+2, Luis Fernando 
> Planella Gonzalez wrote:
>>
>> It has always been said that GWT is active when similar questions are 
>> asked in the forum.
>> However, given that the last version, 2.8.2, was released on Oct 19, 2017 
>> and was a bugfix for the 2.8.0 version, released on Oct 20, 2016, I can't 
>> see it as "active".
>> At least it smells bad!
>> Even the 1.0 release of Elemental can't be used, because it requires 
>> newer components than the pre-packaged version.
>> It is a sad thing, because I work on a large project using GWT since its 
>> 1.5.0 version, and our project is actively developed and still evolving.
>> I hope GWT 2.9 is out "soon", because we're planning to switch to Java 11 
>> in the coming months, and it would be a burden to maintain a separated Java 
>> version only for the frontend part (been there, done that with Java 8).
>> The fact is that since Google left the project, things are way too slow.
>> Understandable, as it is based on best effor from the brave developers, 
>> but still disheartening.
>> Still, I don't loose hope that GWT will be still maintained.
>>
>> Em terça-feira, 18 de fevereiro de 2020 12:08:40 UTC-3, Jeff Zemsky 
>> escreveu:
>>>
>>> Frank - Thanks for the reply, but it would be good to understand the 
>>> plans to complete the GWT 2.9 release - particularly with reference to Java 
>>> 11 support.  Any insight there?
>>>
>>> On Monday, January 27, 2020 at 4:23:09 AM UTC-5, Frank Hossfeld wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Atm the community is very active. We are working on GWT modules: 
>>>> replacing generators and JSNI, testig the migraed moules against J2CL, etc.
>>>> Besides that, many new frameworks are evolving.
>>>>
>>>> Take a look at this rooms:
>>>> https://gitter.im/gwtproject/gwt
>>>> https://gitter.im/vertispan/j2cl
>>>> https://gitter.im/DominoKit/domino
>>>> to get more infos.
>>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/aeb65c19-7e99-47ab-bee9-12699a90625d%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to