Can you clarify the browser event that you are working with? If it is 
something through JsInterop, then this is expected, since JSNI style calls 
into Java from JS require $entry, but jsinterop provides no such mechanism. 
If it is an event from a GWT Widget, then that would go through JSNI, and 
this should not happen. 

As such, https://github.com/gwtproject/gwt-core has an updated Scheduler 
which is compatible with JsInterop calls - scheduleFinally is now 
implemented as a microtask, so that it will always precede any subsequent 
event, no matter how the event originates. The gwt-core project also 
contains an updated StyleInjector, and a corresponding gwt-resources module 
(not yet moved to github.com/gwtproject) will provide an updated 
ClientBundle implementation. 

Note that as we're committed to maintaining legacy dev mode in the GWT 2.x 
branch, we cannot replace the com.google.gwt.core.client.Scheduler wiring 
with jsinterop.

On Sunday, June 21, 2020 at 6:13:54 AM UTC-5, Gordan Krešić wrote:
>
> I'll take the blame for code design, no questions about that :) 
>
> Do you think it's worth filing a bug report or this is too much of an edge 
> case in a code that is going away soon anyway? Note that I didn't test 
> against org.gwtproject.core.client.Scheduler only 
> com.google.gwt.core.client.Scheduler (and they do differ, at least 
> regarding 
> scheduleFinally). 
>
>
> On 19. 06. 2020. 09:42, Thomas Broyer wrote: 
> > Yes, we can probably consider that a bug in GWT. 
> > I'd also call this pattern of doing real work in a static initializer a 
> code 
> > smell: 
> > 
> http://misko.hevery.com/code-reviewers-guide/flaw-constructor-does-real-work/ 
> > While still a flaw considering the above link, it's however a common 
> > practice to call `ensureInjected()` from the class constructor (ideally, 
> > you'd rather call it in a lifecycle method, such as Activity#start, or 
> > Widget#onAttach); and that would likely fix your issue here. 
> > 
> > On Thursday, June 18, 2020 at 8:33:06 PM UTC+2, Gordan Krešić wrote: 
> > 
> >     On 18. 06. 2020. 20:25, Gordan Krešić wrote: 
> >      > Probably unrelated with StyleInjector but with 
> Scheduler.scheduleFinally 
> > 
> >     Ok, I've put a most basic repro case to prove that this is a 
> Scheduler 
> >     issue: 
> > 
> >     public class Foo { 
> > 
> >              static { 
> >                      Scheduler.get().scheduleFinally(() -> 
> >     GWT.log("Finally!")); 
> >              } 
> > 
> >     } 
> > 
> >     Now initialite Foo on startup (in EntryPoint.onModuleLoad() for 
> example), 
> >     but "Finally!" will be printed only *after* first event loop, like 
> >     described: 
> > 
> >     Scheduler.get().scheduleFixedDelay(() -> { 
> >              return false; 
> >     }, 0); 
> > 
> >              -gkresic. 
> > 
> > -- 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups 
> > "GWT Users" group. 
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> an 
> > email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> > <mailto:google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>. 
> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
> > 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/1ecd7663-8a5a-449e-aef5-4008d3735433o%40googlegroups.com
>  
> > <
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/1ecd7663-8a5a-449e-aef5-4008d3735433o%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
>  
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/0d761c71-bb99-44b2-9581-9aee45cff40bo%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to