Sorry, wrong link. This one is correct: https://gitter.im/gwtproject/gwt-modules
Frank Hossfeld schrieb am Sonntag, 7. März 2021 um 12:47:27 UTC+1: > Gordan Krešić schrieb am Samstag, 6. März 2021 um 18:24:17 UTC+1 > >> I can see it still references widgets, so definitely not a final port, >> but >> if you are interested I can propose pull request based on my own port >> which >> uses elemental2.dom.HTMLElement instead of widgets. However, that should >> be >> up to a debate, because I believe more modular approach would be needed >> to >> cover most use cases: widgets, elemental2's HTMLElement, elemento's >> IsElement and possibly others. >> > > Yeap, that's the problem. (and the reason, why Nalu uses several plugins, > to deal with the different implementations). We haven start the discussion > yet. And ATM, I am not sure, if IsWidget and Widget, is already migrated.I > think not. Think it is gwt-widgets, which is not yet done too, or at least > it is still in progress. Maybe something to discuss inside the gwt-modules > room: https://github.com/gwtproject > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/0c7e4ac9-d739-48f4-9ef2-b0ea252dfcedn%40googlegroups.com.
