@leon.p: This would be interesting... Could you try to build the project as I mentioned in my article? To see what time we would get there?
Here is the article: https://bit.ly/GWTM1ProPerformance and https://bit.ly/GWTM1MaxPerformance Record is: 1. Without -T 1C clean install: 2m21s 2. With -T 1C clean install: *1m13s* Would like to see if someone can get faster than this 😉 Thanks, Lofi [email protected] schrieb am Samstag, 15. Januar 2022 um 13:19:48 UTC+1: > For around a 1000 euro, you can build a desktop that is faster compiling > than any laptop. > And on linux the memory is used a lot more efficient than on a mac, so you > need less. > That being said - I have a macbook when I travel. But in the office and at > home I switched to working on desktops about 5 yrs ago. > > > > Op woensdag 12 januari 2022 om 09:12:42 UTC+1 schreef Shawn: > >> I kinda like the Max 64GB. I'm pushing 54GB used for eclipse (running an >> appengine dev and GWT server) during a build. My upload to google cloud is >> slow so after the build I can easily start developing again while it's >> deploying. >> >> I also use a ramdisk and set the GWT SuperDev mode to use that with >> -workDir /Users/me/.tmpdisk/GWT_RAM_DISK. Then build with an ant task and >> add this to the gwtc java task for building. >> >> <sysproperty key=*"gwt.persistentunitcachedir"* value= >> *"/Users/me/.tmpdisk/GWT_RAM_DISK"*/> >> >> >> No benchmarks but probably the biggest benefit is debugging which I still >> do in Eclipse via SDGB. >> >> I haven't been able to get Eclipse to run natively as macOS AArch64 >> <https://www.eclipse.org/downloads/download.php?file=/technology/epp/downloads/release/2021-12/R/eclipse-jee-2021-12-R-macosx-cocoa-aarch64.dmg> >> is >> only available from the 2021-12 version which just borks my project. It >> seems to be a conflict with the google-cloud-plugin I use for appengine. >> Still 2021-09 with emulated Eclipse is a major improvement especially since >> the dev server and build processes can be run natively. >> >> Anyway, 32GB on a pro ordered today is about a month to get delivery and >> 64GB on a max is about two months. I got a 64GB max with 32 GPUs (maybe I >> can use those for machine learning) as it was the only way to get more than >> 16GB of memory without waiting so long and I had to move suddenly and >> couldn't bring my iMac. >> >> On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 9:17 AM 'Frank Hossfeld' via GWT Users < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> No, sorry ... closed source. Yep, I agree with. Don't think, that the >>> graphics CPUs will have an impact of the compile time. >>> So, the M1 Pro is a great choice for developers. Now I am waiting for >>> the next Mac Pro ... >>> >>> Jens schrieb am Montag, 6. Dezember 2021 um 10:32:15 UTC+1: >>> >>>> I did some tests with one of my larger GWT projects. It takes 3:55 on >>>>> my "old" MacBook Pro 16" i9 2.4 GHz, 64 GB RAM. Same project build on a >>>>> new >>>>> MacBook Pro M1 Max 64 GB takes roundabout 2:00. That's an incredible >>>>> improvement. >>>> >>>> >>>> Is that project public? Then I would try it with my M1 Pro 32gb which >>>> is IMHO the best value for developers, unless you do graphics stuff. >>>> >>>> -- J. >>>> >>> -- >>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "GWT Users" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> >> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/c3bacc36-a959-4833-be07-6304e3f5705cn%40googlegroups.com >>> >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/c3bacc36-a959-4833-be07-6304e3f5705cn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/42e6deda-9922-448a-8350-6d5473c0e047n%40googlegroups.com.
