Thanks for the info. A very good explanation in that video.

But still don't understand why would this solution with WASM GC 2x faster 
than the *"pure transpiling"* solution? The latter is completely in JS and 
uses the GC from JS as it is.

Does this means using JS with WASM will be 2x faster than the pure JS??? 🤣

Thanks 
Lofi

Craig Mitchell schrieb am Freitag, 12. Mai 2023 um 12:27:43 UTC+2:

> At Google I/O 2023, they showed that WASM (Web Assembly) is finally 
> getting garbage collection (as well as shared memory).
>
> https://developers.googleblog.com/2023/05/bringing-kotlin-to-web.html
> https://youtu.be/RcHER-3gFXI?t=604
>
> They showed that JetBrains was experimenting with Kotlin compiling to WASM.
>
> There wasn't any mention of anyone doing Java compilation to WASM.
>
> I wonder how hard it would be to modify GWT to compile to WASM.  
> Possible?  Thoughts?
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/3e467b07-cc83-4238-b2d0-f2850c215e67n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to