Hi!

Were you successful in building out a JAR using spring boot while still 
using GWT RPC? I am on the last step of getting the `.gwt.rpc` files in the 
right place but I still get serialization errors saying the serialization 
policy files are missing. 

For the override you did:
@Override
protected SerializationPolicy doGetSerializationPolicy(HttpServletRequest 
request, String moduleBaseURL, String strongName) {
          return SerializationPolicyLoader.loadFromStream(new 
ClassPathResource("classpath:yourLocation/" + 
strongName+".gwt.rpc").getInputStream(), null);
}

where in the JAR did you add the gwt.rpc files and how did you access them 
from here?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks!

On Tuesday, 6 December 2022 at 18:57:27 UTC-5 Dr. Lofi Dewanto wrote:

> Thanks a lot for the tips on Spring Boot packaging in JAR. 
>
> Yes, the first example I showed was with packaging WAR. That works fine.
>
> I would try your tips to be able to run on the JAR packaging (second 
> example).
>
> I'll tell you, whether I'm successful or not. 
>
> It is weird, that I could run the RemoteLoggingServiceImpl.java for GWT 
> logger on the JAR packaging but not the RemoteServlet.
>
> Thanks,
> Lofi 
>
> Leon Pennings <leon.p...@gmail.com> schrieb am Di., 6. Dez. 2022, 14:28:
>
>> In addition to previous poster -> yes you can keep on using the GWT RPC. 
>>
>> The things I had to change in order to keep it working when packaging the 
>> spring boot jar, was;
>> 1 - to make sure Spring Boot runs the servlets (enough on the web for 
>> that)
>> 2 - to make sure the gwt compile ends up in de classes folder before the 
>> .jar is created 
>> 3 - to make sure the servlet can access the .gwt.rpc file to validate the 
>> servlet calls. 
>> Normally that is available to the servlet from the war package, but since 
>> it's a jar with Spring boot you need to make some changes;
>> For that I had to override the RemoteServiceServlet method;
>>
>> @Override
>> protected SerializationPolicy doGetSerializationPolicy(HttpServletRequest 
>> request, String moduleBaseURL, String strongName) {
>>           return SerializationPolicyLoader.loadFromStream(new 
>> ClassPathResource("classpath:yourLocation/" + 
>> strongName+".gwt.rpc").getInputStream(), null);
>> }
>>
>> So the changes are quite limited and not as much Spring boot specific, 
>> but more the oddities of changing the package format from a .war to a .jar
>> That was all -> runs like a charm
>> Op maandag 5 december 2022 om 23:00:26 UTC+1 schreef lofid...@gmail.com:
>>
>>> Hi All, 
>>>
>>> you don't have to move GWT RPC to REST and JSON when you want to move 
>>> the backend to Spring Boot. GWT RPC is just a servlet which you can 
>>> register in Spring Boot.
>>>
>>> Here are some examples of the standard GWT Demo StockWatcher but 
>>> implemented using Spring Boot with GWT RPC and REST JSON:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/lofidewanto/stockwatcher
>>>
>>> (1) This example shows how to integrate the GWT RPC servlet to Spring 
>>> Boot using @WebServlet: 
>>> https://github.com/lofidewanto/stockwatcher/blob/master/stockwatcher-springboot-webapp/stockwatcher-springboot-webapp-server/src/main/java/stockwatcher/GreetingServiceImpl.java
>>>
>>> (2) This example shows to integrate the GWT RPC servlet to Spring Boot, 
>>> but I think doesn't work so far. I could take a look if you want to.
>>>
>>>
>>> https://github.com/lofidewanto/stockwatcher/blob/master/stockwatcher-springboot/stockwatcher-springboot-server/src/main/java/stockwatcher/WebConfig.java
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Lofi
>>>
>>> Michael Joyner schrieb am Montag, 21. November 2022 um 16:50:29 UTC+1:
>>>
>>>> *Are you using gwt-RPC ?*
>>>> Yes! we are using GWT-RPC & currently having a single WAR of near about 
>>>> 500mb, having CLIENT-SHARED-SERVER in a same project.
>>>>
>>>> You can still have everything in a master parent project that builds 
>>>> the final WAR with all the client JS and SERVER classes in the same war.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *You'll need to switch to JSON for data transport.*
>>>> Is there any drawback of switching to JSON in GWT, such as impact on 
>>>> performance etc.
>>>>
>>>> You lose easy polymorphism for models, they will require an extra set 
>>>> of annotations at the very least if you have polymorphism as part of your 
>>>> DTO setup.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *You'll need to use something like DominoKit REST.*
>>>> We found one RestyGWT <https://resty-gwt.github.io/>, but not sure 
>>>> about its final impact as we haven't applied it yet. any suggestions...
>>>>
>>>> RestyGWT is effectively defunct. Stick with a modern GWT3 compatible 
>>>> approach such as DominoKit.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *It would be also be best to split the project into three projects. An 
>>>> API project, a shared code project, and a UI project.*
>>>> We cannot get why keeping *SHARED CODE *as a separate project is best. 
>>>> We are not having any library of GWT on server side. So except MODELS, 
>>>> what 
>>>> are the other stuffs we can have in SHARED CODE PROJECT.   
>>>>
>>>> In this case SHARED CODE is really just the MODELS and INTERFACES and 
>>>> possible the REST Interface.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *If you are using gwt-RPC then IMHO there will need to be a big 
>>>> refactoring change at the very least*
>>>> This is where we are stuck & looking for the solution with a minimum 
>>>> change and should be stable but unable to figure out yet. 
>>>>
>>>> I don't think you can accomplish this with a large project with minimum 
>>>> of change unless the client API calls are fully abstracted away (or can 
>>>> be) 
>>>> so that code could be replaced with a different class.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Monday, November 21, 2022 at 7:37:33 PM UTC+5:30 Michael Joyner 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> There are a lot of factors to consider.
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you using gwt-RPC ? You'll need to switch to JSON for data 
>>>>> transport.
>>>>>
>>>>> You'll need to use something like DominoKit REST (
>>>>> https://github.com/DominoKit/domino-rest)  for the data transport 
>>>>> layer.
>>>>>
>>>>> It would be also be best to split the project into three projects. An 
>>>>> API project, a shared code project, and a UI project.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you are using gwt-RPC then IMHO there will need to be a big 
>>>>> refactoring change at the very least.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/21/22 08:19, viny...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> We are having a huge project already running successfully on GWT. 
>>>>>
>>>>> But for some reasons we are planning to move our backend to 
>>>>> SPRING-BOOT keeping front end in GWT. 
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there any way we can do it easily without a big change in our 
>>>>> existing application. 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "GWT Users" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>> an email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/c267bbb3-504f-41a8-896a-a2c2463eccdcn%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>  
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/c267bbb3-504f-41a8-896a-a2c2463eccdcn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "GWT Users" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/1790c907-ce31-4d97-a5b9-1915fef68865n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/1790c907-ce31-4d97-a5b9-1915fef68865n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
>> Google Groups "GWT Users" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-web-toolkit/13cHZX5KoQA/unsubscribe
>> .
>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
>> google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/5535048c-bbc2-4f58-8cf4-11025a166464n%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/5535048c-bbc2-4f58-8cf4-11025a166464n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/4e6ddddf-68b8-49a7-875b-e645fed2828cn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to