Hi Vegegoku, Thanks for clearing that up.
At some point I will definitely try the domino-rest/jackson. For now I dread the time I will eventually be forced to port my current setup. On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 5:13 PM Vegegoku <[email protected]> wrote: > The annotation on the POJO is not required at all, Domino-rest will auto > generate the json-mapping classes if the jax-rs/jakarata resource > consumes/produces a json even if the annotation is missing, so you can keep > the POJO clean or only have Jackson compatible annotations. ;-) > > On Thursday, January 11, 2024 at 11:35:05 AM UTC+3 Vassilis Virvilis wrote: > >> First of all thanks for doing this work. It is hugely appreciated and >> required in order to avoid GWT and GWT projects look like zombies in a dead >> landscape. >> >> I am using RestyGWT and yes I also believe it uses Generators >> (GWT.create() ?). I am facing a problem there since RestyGWT is deadish >> itself. >> >> One of the reasons I abandoned GWT-RPC was Jsinterop. With Jsinterop you >> can include and link to js libraries in the client. Some of them require >> data from the backend e.g. datatables.net, d3 etc. GWT-RPC is not >> compatible with them so I would need to use RequestFactory, which I never >> liked or another framework. So why have two of them? Use one. Go to JSON. >> RestyGWT was the only viable choice at the time. >> >> With Resty-GWT I can have my POjOs *without annotations*, and I can >> share them between backend, frontend and other clients (non web). RestyGWT >> has 2 backends: >> - an older private jackson like (forked) implementation. That's the one I >> use. >> - a newer gwt-jackson based one. This one never worked for me. >> >> Furthermore I have invested in RestGWT and I have some custom patches so >> RestyGWT can transmit my generics. >> >> At this point domino-jackson and domino-rest looks like the way forward >> but from a quick look require annotations in the POJO and this is something >> that I would like to avoid. >> >> Just my 2 bits. Sorry if incoherent... >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 9:45 PM Michael Conrad <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> You should investigate the DominoKit project. They have a much more >>> up-to-date JSON/Jackson-ish implementation. >>> >>> Ref: https://github.com/DominoKit/domino-rest >>> >>> >>> >>> On 1/10/24 11:26, Christian Hebert wrote: >>> >>> Hi guys, I've seen the changes in the new release regarding jakarta >>> servlets, which is great, it's a step toward jakarta but to this day, GWT >>> is still based on the Servlet API 3.1. >>> >>> Prior of seeing that change, I tried to move away from RPC calls and use >>> http requests instead. I found a nice library called RestyGWT ( >>> https://resty-gwt.github.io/) who can really simplify the process of >>> handling json data from/to a Rest API. >>> >>> So I converted my GWT remote servlets to a Rest API, made a few minor >>> changes in my client code and voilà, I was able to deploy it on a Jakarta >>> Application server since there is no GWT involved on the server side >>> anymore. >>> >>> The last version of RestyGWT has been release in 2020 so I'm not sure >>> how active this project is but from what I've seen it's enough for me. >>> >>> So, I would like to get your thoughts on that. Would you go on that >>> road? stick to RPC calls and wait for a version of GWT based on Jakarta? >>> build your "own" GWT with the changes introduced in the vew version? >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "GWT Users" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/8fa7dc19-2a15-442d-93b2-adebb947046cn%40googlegroups.com >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/8fa7dc19-2a15-442d-93b2-adebb947046cn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "GWT Users" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> >> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/156e77ff-25bd-4743-8798-0d0347d1866d%40newsrx.com >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/156e77ff-25bd-4743-8798-0d0347d1866d%40newsrx.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> >> >> >> -- >> Vassilis Virvilis >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "GWT Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/4fc34b98-5504-4981-a942-ae633f4b77e9n%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/4fc34b98-5504-4981-a942-ae633f4b77e9n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- Vassilis Virvilis -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/CAKbOjExmN_Cbf7u%2B1Bm_B0DY1DXisTPjB9eS6GMaQYsyjL6PvA%40mail.gmail.com.
