I thank you Thomas for the clarification unfortunately I am forced to use
setters and getters because I cannot find another way to set the values and
compile the GWT java client.
As you said I seem to have solved it with:
@JsProperty public native String getCodeAdministration();
@JsProperty public native void setCodeAdministration(String
codeAdministration);
Il giorno martedì 21 maggio 2024 alle 17:15:59 UTC+2 Thomas Broyer ha
scritto:
> With the following:
>
> @JsType(namespace = JsPackage.GLOBAL, name = "Object", isNative = true)
> public class XXXGWT {
> public String codiceAmministrazione;
> }
>
> you should be able to write:
>
> var xxx = new XXXGWT();
> xxx.codiceAmministrazione = "foo";
>
> and have it translate more or less to:
>
> let xxx = new $wnd.Object()
> xxx.codiceAmministrazione = "foo";
>
> With the getter and setter, you have to annotate them with @JsProperty,
> but the generated JS will be identical, so you've actually only made your
> code more verbose for no compelling reasons (besides maybe pleasing static
> analyzers like Sonar that will yell if you don't encapsulate fields).
>
>
> On Tuesday, May 21, 2024 at 4:30:35 PM UTC+2 [email protected] wrote:
>
> Just to be clear on my use case this is my java class:
>
> @JsType(namespace = JsPackage.GLOBAL, name = "Object", isNative = true)
> public class XXXGWT {
>
> private String codiceAmministrazione;
>
> @JsConstructor
> public DocumentoPAC4DTOGWT() {}
>
> public native String getCodiceAmministrazione();
>
> public native void setCodiceAmministrazione(String codiceAmministrazione);
>
> }
>
> and this is the erorr i'm getting on the setter :
>
>
> DesktopApp-0.js:13132 Tue May 21 16:24:02 GMT+200 2024
> com.google.gwt.logging.client.LogConfiguration SEVERE: Exception caught:
> (TypeError) : b.setCodiceAmministrazione is not a function
> com.google.gwt.event.shared.UmbrellaException: Exception caught:
> (TypeError) : b.setCodiceAmministrazione is not a function
> Il giorno martedì 21 maggio 2024 alle 14:56:22 UTC+2 Marco Tenti
> (IoProgrammo88) ha scritto:
>
> Sorry Thomas about your last comment " I'd rather user fields than
> getters/setters for such objects " can you point me out to some example
> for this ?
>
> Il giorno mercoledì 29 giugno 2022 alle 09:48:49 UTC+2 Thomas Broyer ha
> scritto:
>
> Using isNative=true, you're telling GWT that you're only "mapping" in Java
> a *type* that exists in JS. The default naming rule is that the full name
> of that type is the fully qualified name of the Java class, you can change
> the simple name with 'name', and the *prefix* with namespace (which
> defaults to the package name for top-level classes, or the enclosing type's
> JS name for nested classes). So with namespace=GLOBAL but without the
> name="Object", you're saying that you want to basically do a 'new
> $wnd.MyPluginConfig()' in JS, and the browser rightfully complains that
> there's no such MyPluginConfig. Adding name="Object" means you'll do a 'new
> $wnd.Object()' in JS.
>
> Fwiw, I'd rather user fields than getters/setters for such objects. YMMV.
>
> On Wednesday, June 29, 2022 at 8:38:19 AM UTC+2 Nicolas Chamouard wrote:
>
> Thank you !
> It is a bit mysterious to me, but with *name = "Object"* the constructor
> works :)
>
>
> Le mercredi 29 juin 2022 à 00:47:32 UTC+2, [email protected] a écrit :
>
> try adding name = "Object" so that it uses an empty javascript Object as
> the wrapped item.
>
> I found this via Googling:
>
> @JsType(namespace = JsPackage.GLOBAL, isNative = true, name = "Object")
> public class MyPluginConfig { @JsProperty public void setXXXX(String
> str); @JsProperty public String getXXXX(); ... }
>
> Ref: https://stackoverflow.com/a/36329387/12407701
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 6:24 PM Nicolas Chamouard <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Yes, it does not change anything :
>
> @JsType(*isNative*=*true*, *namespace* = JsPackage.*GLOBAL*)
>
> *public* *class* OptionOverrides {
>
>
> @JsConstructor
>
> *public* OptionOverrides() {}
>
>
>
> @JsProperty
>
> *public* *native* String getInitialView();
>
> @JsProperty
>
> *public* *native* *void* setInitialView(String initialView);
>
> }
>
>
> Still the same error : *$wnd.OptionOverrides is not a constructor*
>
> Le mardi 28 juin 2022 à 23:27:08 UTC+2, [email protected] a écrit :
>
> Have you tried giving the class a constructor?
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 4:04 PM Nicolas Chamouard <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am using JsInterop to integrate FullCalendar to my GWT application.
> As described here https://fullcalendar.io/docs/initialize-globals, I am
> supposed to create an object literal and pass it to the Calendar()
> constructor.
>
> I have managed to create this class :
>
> @JsType(*namespace* = JsPackage.*GLOBAL*)
>
> *public* *class* OptionOverrides {
>
>
> @JsProperty
>
> *public* *native* String getInitialView();
>
> @JsProperty
>
> *public* *native* *void* setInitialView(String initialView);
>
> }
>
> It works but the FullCalendar complains about all the Java Object stuff
> that is translated to javascript : equals(), hashCode(), etc
>
> I have tried to add* isNative=true* to my class, but in this case i
> cannot instantiate it in Java (error : $wnd.OptionOverrides is not a
> constructor)
>
> Is there an other way to do this, am I missing something here ?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "GWT Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/a03c881a-48d4-4892-9fae-7719bc9a57b8n%40googlegroups.com
>
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/a03c881a-48d4-4892-9fae-7719bc9a57b8n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "GWT Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
>
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/4d8099ea-3a37-4026-b459-f228e35ca59bn%40googlegroups.com
>
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/4d8099ea-3a37-4026-b459-f228e35ca59bn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/5ee556d1-0ef6-443f-86b8-355f4619cf07n%40googlegroups.com.
