Richard schrieb: > That article is great! Are you using it in the latest version of GWT? > I think this is the sollution for the problem. The blog is dated, do > you know or a more recent implementation is available?
I don't know but the used technique has not changed since that, so a more recent implementation shouldn't be much different from that one. > Besides that, they are writing about 60% client cpu usage. Got any > experience with that? I haven't noticed something like that. But you might search for "GWT Comet" with the search-engine of your choice if there are other implementations of newer age. Regards, Lothar --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
