jake H schrieb: > 1)if instead .properties file extension i can use another one.
As far as I know, no. The concept behind is copied from Java's ResourceBundle where the extension is fixed that way. Especially if you want to use the same file for doing localizations on the serverside (e.g. inside the RemoteServiceServlet) you should stay with this file-extension. > 2)I have some simple data , like name etc witch are saved in this > file. But in order to work fine every time i change their values, i > have to recompile. Is there any way to avoid that? The text in the property-file is included into the generated HTML-file, the compiler creates out of the Java-class and the property-files, so there is no other way if you use this framework. You can of course change your localization to using Dictionarys instead of the Message-Framework where the data is read into the HTML-page and you access it using a map-access. But that way you lose the advantage that the compiler is already telling you if you misspelled a key of your localization and you lose a bit of performance because the Map must be loaded in addition to the HTML-page. So it's up to you, but personally I think that the time needed for recompilation is short enough to buy the advantages you have with this concept. Even if you have a larger project, you don't need to start a recompile every time you simply change one entry in the properties- file but use your imagination instead ;-) Regards, Lothar --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
