On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Arthur Kalmenson <[email protected]>wrote:
> > 1) Backwards compatibility. If we updated JUnitShell to use HostedMode, > it > > seems like old test cases would probably break. The idea of a > > JUnitHostedMode is a good one... but how would we be able to tell which > one > > the user meant, since the JUnit framework is in control? > > So does this mean that GWTTestCases still spawns off a headless hosted > mode that's using an embedded Tomcat and not an embedded Jetty? > That is correct. It sounds like what I'm hearing though, is that there would be a lot of interest in us providing an explicit upgrade path, so that tests could be transitioned. If we did this, it might even make sense to deprecate the old-style but keep it in for now for backwards compatibility. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
