Hello all, And we are generating the Table HTML on server side, and put it as innerHTML and have performance 1000 rows - 3-4 second in IE. The biggest problem is using components which should handle events and placed in such table, but it seems JSNI is a solution in this case. In our case Links already working. So it seems this is the optimal solution if you need high performance.
On Mar 4, 7:36 pm, eadams <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the suggestions. > > Changing the code to add the FlexTable to the scroll panel after > loading the data resulted in a good improvement. The 268 row parts > list will now load in IE in just over 5 seconds. I tried the setVisible > () suggestion as well, but that did not yield much change. The changes > yielded an elapsed time of 0.3 seconds in Firefox. > > On Mar 4, 11:55 am, Lothar Kimmeringer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > eadams schrieb: > > > > The > > > timings showed the first third was in about 1.5 seconds, the next > > > third was in about 4 seconds and the last third in over 6 seconds. > > > This elapsed time is after thedatahas been received from the server > > > (which is also very fast). > > > > All of the above is on a Windows Vista client using IE 7. Testing the > > > same code on FireFox 3.0.6, the 268 rows display in under 1 second. Is > > > this a known problem with IE and are there any work arounds? > > > Unfortunately FireFox is not a solution for this issue as the > > > company's only approved browser is IE. > > > It's a rendering issue and not the only one. Try creating a > > Tree with 100.000 elements and have a look how much fun you > > have with InternetExplorer and Firefox (Safari is very fast > > here which makes me jealous). > > > One thing I haven't tried but you might try out is adding > > the flex-table to the panel after adding all rows. This > > might speed up things because InternetExplorer seems to > > redraw the whole table when adding rows (this is not GWT- > > specific, I had the same effects with other web-frameworks > > in the Good Old Days(R) as well). Or - if that has no effect - > > you might play around with setVisible. > > > Regards, Lothar --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
