A prototype that sounds like a good idea. We can keep talking about doing
all sorts of stuffs butwill never be through until we put this into a
working code.

On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 5:48 AM, Matías Costa <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Andreas Karlsson <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> What I (plan) to do is to automatically recompile the whole
>> application when a client-plugin is added.
>>
>> So I keep a plugin registry on the server side and when I enable/add a
>> plugin I generate some glue files and recompile + redeploy the whole
>> GWT-client automatically, this to get the most benefits from GWT
>> optimizations.
>>
>
> I am in the design phase of a application that will be deployed on
> different offices, each one with almost equal  workflows, automatizing,
> staff and requisites. Yeah, that "almost" sucks. The idea is to get one big
> common or default subset, build some kind of plugin / extension / delegation
> system for the specific and deploy different builds without forking the
> codebase. That forking should be a nightmare.
>
> So, your way was the initial idea, and in our project fits. But some kind
> of dynamic plugin loading and upgrading, without touching the core install
> is ideal, and a very powerful tool. For example, you can do per user plugin
> configs.
>
> So, Rosh, what do you think about doing a small prototype? I see
> appropriate contact via private mail, work on that and publish the results
> pointing problems and wait for feedback. We can be days talking about the
> idea, but only the code can prove it can work, and looks like anybody has
> done something similar.
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to