You might also want to take a look at Spring ME. It's not targeting
GWT in particular, but it currently includes an example that uses it
for a GWT application.

Spring ME relies on compile time dependency injection, just like GIN.

http://springframework.me/

On Feb 27, 10:07 pm, Arthur Kalmenson <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm using Google GIN on our current project and it's working out
> _very_ well. It's really slick and worked out of the box (aside from
> some minor issues which are resolved quickly by the devs).
>
> --
> Arthur Kalmenson
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Thomas Broyer <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On 27 fév, 17:41, jesty <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> I'm starting a new project based on GWT and I wantdependency
> >>injection!
> >> I've seen this two framework, but I'm not sure about the best choose.
>
> >> Can you help me? What do you guide me to this choose?
>
> > I'd go for GIN, which has "little-to-no runtime overhead compared to
> > manual DI" thanks to "using GWT's compile-time Generator support".
> >http://code.google.com/p/google-gin/
>
> > But you might also want to look at Suco:
> >http://code.google.com/p/suco/
> > It has a "Guice-like API" but does everything at run-time (contrary to
> > GIN which tries to do everything at compile-time)
>
> > rocket-gwt and gwtoolbox have the same compile-time approach as GIN
> > but using a Spring-like XML-based configuration. Given that you get
> > bean instances by name, I suspect it has a slight overhead over GIN.
> > However, rocket-gwt supports AOP (interceptors/advices) which others
> > don't, but again you'll pay it in the compiled code (GIN's plan is to
> > inline aspects to reduce overhead, and that's probably why it's not
> > implemented yet...)
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to