DOM.toString(RootPanel.get().getElement()) On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 1:45 AM, Darkflame <[email protected]> wrote:
> > As a mater of interest semi-relivent to this, Is it possible to "burn > out" GWT webpages into static html? (obviously losing > interaction...just taking a snapshot of the current state of the dom > and expressing the html nesscery to reproduce it). > I mean, I guess you could cut and paste out of firebug, but is there a > better method? > > > On Apr 6, 5:35 pm, Jason Essington <[email protected]> wrote: > > There are discussions about this (SEO) on this list, have a search for > > them. > > > > But basically, you'll want to embed the information you want indexed > > into your host pages. This is not a GWT limitation but rather a > > limitation of any web application that uses DOM modification to > > present content. > > > > -jason > > > > On Apr 6, 2009, at 9:29 AM, Prashant Gupta wrote: > > > > > > > > > any alternative or solution to this ? > > > > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 7:20 PM, djd <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Current crawl bots ignore flash and javascript. > > > So if your web app is completely built in GWT (the default behavior > > > when creating a project with projectCreator is to create a single HTML > > > file with a single link to a .nocache.js files which is actually your > > > entry point for entire app), all content will be discarded. > > > > > On Apr 6, 4:11 pm, Prashant Gupta <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > does my GWT website gets indexed same as any other (non GWT) > > > website..? > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
