For development, yes. Simply add the other project as a dependancy.
However, you can try fooling around with the classpath you provide the
compiler - maybe that will work.
<java failonerror="true" fork="true"
classname="com.google.gwt.dev.Compiler">
<classpath>
<pathelement location="path to my beans"/>
<pathelement location="src"/>
</classpath>
<arg value="com.foo.bar.MyModule"/>
</java>
If it doesn't, you could always just maintain an ant task that takes those
beans & packages them into a module. No it's not ideal because of the
multiple locations you have to keep track of dependancies, but it should
work.
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:51 PM, TimOnGmail <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I found some discussions of this here, but the answer always seems to
> be "you can't" (unless you make them part of a module, with a common
> parent, etc. etc., which I do not want to do).
>
> Basically, I have this Eclipse project structure:
>
> 1. src/com/mycompany/domain/... (serializable domain objects)
>
> 2. gwt/[recommended structure]
>
> I want the serializable domain objects in #1 available to the module
> in #2, WITHOUT HAVING TO MAKE #1 A MODULE.
> Seems like it should be doable, doesn't it? But from what I've read
> here, it can't be done.
>
> I also tried putting everything in #2 into the top level src/
> hierarchy, and put all the module support files in the top level of
> the project, but I couldn't get it work that way, either.
>
> So... as of today, is it at all possible to have 2 separate source
> hierarchies, 1 of which contains a GWT module, the other of which
> contains simple serializable beans, and have the module be aware of
> the other classes? I mean, they are there, they are serializable, the
> source is available - why wouldn't it be possible to point the GWT
> module to any arbitrary place where there are classes that can be
> used? Seems weird.
>
> Failing that, is it possible to have a standard Eclipse project
> format, like the above, with the GWT module classes embedded in the
> src/ hierarchy? If so, how would you set up the module file, etc.?
>
> - Tim
>
>
> On Apr 7, 5:25 pm, TimOnGmail <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi all...
> >
> > I've looked around here, and didn't find this specific question asked
> > (although I'm sure it has been).
> >
> > I have created a module, and have a bunch of bean classes residing
> > elsewhere. These bean classes are all Serializable (since I transfer
> > them between several servers already), and I want to use them in my
> > module. However, I don't want to have to turn these other libraries
> > INTO modules just to use these bean classes.
> >
> > Is this even possible in GWT?
> >
> > - Tim
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
