Yeah, makes sense. I'd still do the log statement in the static initializer just to be certain.
I don't see how any of this actually new though with 1.6. You could have done all this earlier as well with the appropriate code snippet going into the static block. On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 5:38 AM, Dean S. Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, true - but in GWT, the ONLY reason to reference an Async class it > to make an Async call... > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
