On 04/14/2009 11:12 AM, pohl wrote:
>
> On Apr 13, 6:48�pm, Jeff Chimene<[email protected]>  wrote:
>    
>> Also, remember that GWT does not implement the entire JRE. From the
>> looks of the above error, you might be hitting that limitation, i.e.
>> "delete method not implemented", as well.
>>      
>
> Well, I started with a working application, and only changed the value
> of a String.  So if it was correctly built before, such a change could
> not have introduced new API calls outside of the subset that GWT
> supports.  It looks to me like that delete method is a problem with
> low-level class reloading that may be broken on the current JDK that
> comes with MacOS X.  I've never seen that before, though.
>
> Vitali Lovich wrote:
>    
>> So change the ant script so that it does what you want it to.  I've never
>> gone the noserver route as I've always used the embedded app server (Jetty
>> in 1.6).
>>      
>
> Alas, this is not possible in my application.   Neither Tomcat nor
> Jetty are able to deploy EARs, let alone the stateless session beans
> and entity beans within them.   Therefore "noserver" is my only
> option, and therefore no quick-turnaround-via-hosted-mode love for me.
>
> :-/
>    

That blows.

Don't forget about the change to MODULE.gwt.xml to reduce the 
compilation permutation count. It can make a difference for large values 
of LOC,

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to