The problem is that the compiler will create the code for al objects in the
classpath that implement serialiazable (which are more ore less 10000+).
This results in enormous compile time and huge javascript...

absolutely not doable

any more suggestions?

2009/4/15 Salvador Diaz <diaz.salva...@gmail.com>

>
> > perhaps can we use annotations like @gwt.typeArgs
>
> Those are deprecated, you should really avoid using them
>
> > >  a simple java class containing a Map<String,Object>
>
> Can't you just use a Map<String, Serializable> ? If the map is going
> to be travelling through RPCs you really shouldn't be putting objects
> that don't implement Serializable into it.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Salvador
>
> >
> > > For every service gwt has a list of classes which can be Serialized
> > > (whitelist). If my understanding is right this list is generated by the
> > > compiler at compile time by analizing the members of a class.
> >
> > > But we can have classes (which ARE serializable) inside our transient
> map,
> > > but gwt will not serialize this classes because of the
> SerializationPolicy
> > > (these classes could not be found by the compiler at compile time).
> >
> > > Is there any way to extend the white list of SerializationPolicy.java ?
> >
> > > If I add all classes as private members to my class the members are
> found
> > > and the class can be serialized, but this is anoying and we cant do
> this for
> > > all classes (we dynamically decide which classes we need to transfer)
> >
> > > Anyone got any expierence with that?
> >
> > > Maybe open an issue about this?
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to