replace: com.google.gwt.client.Index::createPopup()() by website.client.Index::createPopup(I)(i);
Which seem to be your client package ... On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Chuck <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, you're right, thank you. Unfortunately this didn't solve the > problem. I got an error now: "Unresolvable native reference to type > 'com.google.gwt.client.Index'" > > Do you know how to reference my own class? Do I have to include the > name of the package? > > > > On 21 Apr., 16:52, olivier nouguier <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi, > > Your java function should receive an int as parameter ... Nope ? > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Chuck <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi there! > > > > > Unfortunately my popup function is not working and I think that I > > > found the reason. Please have a look at the JS code, could it be that > > > "com.google.gwt.client.Index::createPopup()();" is wrong? How can I > > > find out what the real path is of my class called Index? Can anybody > > > help? It works without any error messages but the GWT function is > > > never executed. > > > > > My Java code: > > > > > package website.client; > > > > > import com.google.gwt.core.client.EntryPoint; > > > import com.google.gwt.user.client.Window; > > > > > /** > > > * Entry point classes define <code>onModuleLoad()</code>. > > > */ > > > public class Index implements EntryPoint { > > > > > // EntryPoint! > > > public void onModuleLoad() { > > > > > // Für JavaScript Interface > > > setShowTrigger(this); > > > > > } > > > > > public native void setShowTrigger(Index x) /*-{ > > > $wnd.runApp = function () { > > > [email protected]::createPopup()(); > > > > > }; > > > > > }-*/; > > > > > public void createPopup(int i) { > > > > > Window.alert("I'm a GWT function"); > > > } > > > } > > > > > My HTML code: > > > > > <input type="button" onclick="runApp()" text="click me" value="Test > > > me"/> > > > > > Thanks in advance for helping me!!! > > > > -- > > “There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to > make > > it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way > is > > to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The > first > > method is far more difficult.” > > > > Sir Charles Anthony Richard Hoare > > > -- “There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult.” Sir Charles Anthony Richard Hoare --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
