> Explain again why the name of objects can't be internalized using constants > on the client side?
Maybe that was a bad example. It's easier to explain with exceptions (defined in my application). Exceptions have an errortext that should be internationalized as well. As exceptions are thrown at the server and catch on the client, they are used in all architectural layers. So I cannot use java.util.ResourceBundle as GWT would throw an error (No source code is available for type java.util.ResourceBundle). On the other hand I cannot use the GWT constants interface either as I must not use client code (or client libs) on the server where the exceptions are defined. > Anyways, the general solution would be to set the internationalized string > using java resource bundles in the server code prior to sending the objects > over the wire to the client code. Please explain that to me. How should I set the string? Do you think of some kind of client class that sets all the strings in all server classes that has to be internationalized? That would look crude to me. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
