Thank you, i now made exaclty the same way and it works great.
On 27 Mai, 15:15, Chris <[email protected]> wrote:
> I do this type of thing also. For us it comes down to packing the
> deployments correctly.
>
> We have multiple client applications in the same gwt project (we use
> eclipse). We then have a gwt xml file for each. During our build
> process we build each of the applications separately and the last step
> of the process creates a war with the client apps and server classes.
> We then have different html entry pages for each app.
>
> If you want 1 entry page,the other option is to use deferred binding
> and use a different main module with the entry point for each
> different platform. One for desktop browsers (the default one) and a
> different one for the iPhone which would then be overriden in the
> gwt.xml. Since I haven't done this before, I'm not sure if the entry
> point can be replaced, but it should be possible - even if all the
> main entry point does is call another class that can be deferred
> bound.
>
> Chris...
>
> On May 27, 7:57 am, Paul van Hoven <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > I've developped a GWT app which runs fine. Now a special version for
> > the iPhone of my website is needed. So far i know gwt runs well on the
> > iPhone. But i have a problem.
>
> > On the Desktop-Page the user has the full functionality of my webapp.
> > But on the iPhone he should only be able to use certain functions due
> > to simpler navigation. Both pages use the same business logic on the
> > server. Only the view is different.
>
> > I thought of this approach:
> > If the user comes from a desktop my initial servlet will dispatch him
> > to the desktop version of my site
> > If the user comes from an iphon my initial servlet will dispatch him
> > to the iphone page
>
> > The problem: i do not want to combine the iphone version and the
> > desktop version since then the user would have to load both apps
> > although he would only use one part at a time.
>
> > Therefore i want to split up both parts. What is the best approach for
> > this?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
