Hi,
I would just like to clarify your last point.  I thought that GWT took java
code and turned it into javascript, this is what
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/overview.html seems to indicate, so when I
have deployed my application there is no java running just javascript, have
I missed something?

I suppose what I am trying to ask is do java memory leaks translate into
javascript memory leaks?

Thanks,
Craig Spry

On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 4:36 PM, David <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> In the general case GWT's design guards against common JS pitfalls
> that cause memory leaks.
>
> There are a few known issues though:
> When you use IFrames that memory is never decently released after
> removing the IFrame.
> The FormPanel can also leak.
>
> IE6/IE7 are also consuming a huge amount of memory (half a megabyte
> per image sometimes) if you use ImageBundles.
> That is caused by the AlphaLoader trick they use to support
> transparent PNGs in IE6.
> I disabled this trick for IE7 and now everything runs a lot smoother.
>
> All other memory leaks are possible plain old Java leaks caused by not
> cleaning up or releasing references to objects in you application (so
> your fault!)
>
> David
>
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 1:41 AM, Craig Spry<[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hello All,
> > We've built an application using GWT 1.5.4 that calls a json server and
> the
> > memory usage for the browser that it is running in keeps going up, I've
> > tested this in IE, Firefox and Chrome with the same result.  This
> > application is a widget based application, we have a map widget(open
> street
> > maps) and some list widgets but it doesn't seem to matter which widgets
> that
> > we use the memory seems to grow.  I've tried using each widget
> individually
> > with the same result.  The json that is returned is big, Firebug doesn't
> > give me a value.  Our application polls for new information.
> > I've also tried to use this tool:
> > http://blogs.msdn.com/gpde/pages/javascript-memory-leak-detector.aspx
> > But it didn't detect any leak in javascript.
> > Unfortunatley this is an internal application so I can't point you to our
> > application.  If it would be helpful I'll try and knock up a test case.
> > Has anyone else had this problem?
> > If so what was the solution?
> > Thanks,
> > Craig Spry
> > >
> >
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to