no, but they are not hard to replicate - they rely generally on patterns like SDO http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Service_Data_Objects , which can be trivial to validate, and reasonably easy to bridge to O/R frameworks. They are also much easier to bridge to client side MVC/PVC patterns, without requiring special toolkits to do "data-binding", etc.
On Jun 16, 12:37 am, Thomas Amsler <[email protected]> wrote: > Are any of your "frameworks, which work on generic RPC Models" available to > use? > > Best, > -- Thomas > > > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Dean S. Jones<[email protected]> wrote: > > > Such checks can be "routine" if you are using proper "server side" > > validation of input. I have written several such frameworks, which > > work on "generic RPC Models"... hence the validation can be routine > > and generic. > > > This, as I have pointed out before, is one of the dangers of using > > "Domain Objects" for RPC, and trusting the client that your Domain > > Objects are not ... contaminated... before you use an O/R mapper and > > just persist them. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
