Hi Alen, I'm new in GWT, but I successfully use my own source code generation tools to handle dynamic things on the client in a static way. I'm not sure how exactly the JTypeOracle stuff works, but I like to be able to see and/or debug through the generated code, plus there's no extra ClassLoading involved - the generated stuff is 1st class GWT objects. J.
On Jul 22, 12:18 pm, Alen Vrecko <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks. Good idea. I could have learned by now that there is usually > user and dev lists... Will repost there. > > Cheers > Alen > > On Jul 21, 4:11 pm, Thomas Broyer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 21 juil, 14:30, Alen Vrečko <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi. > > > > The generators are without a doubt a remarkable feature of gwt. But if > > > you use any reflection on the client classes in the generator you lose > > > refresh button support. Furthermore while not that major I do find it > > > annoying that refreshing doesn't recompile the generator code. You > > > have to stop the hosted mode and start again. > > > > It all boils down to the fact that client code is loaded in > > > ComplingClassLoader and the Generator is loaded in a different > > > ClassLoader than that. > > > > Reflection is not that nice. But sometimes one has perfectly > > > legitimate use cases to use reflection. A good example is Google-Gin. > > [...] > > > What do you guys think? > > > ...that you should have used (or at least cc'd) the GWT-C group ;-) > > >http://groups.google.fr/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
