I agree with Isaac 100%. The attitude was completely inappropriate. If a project is time sensitive then it wasn't wise to take the risk and wait for the next release. When one takes risks one should only blame him/her-self.
We should thank google developers for being responsive, for the dialogue that we (GWT users) can have here with them. On Jul 27, 11:31 am, Isaac Truett <itru...@gmail.com> wrote: > None of the plugin developers has made an announcement or offered a > release date. They have responded to questions from anxious developers > eager to see the new version by offering their own hopes or > expectations for delivery. That's more then you get from many > projects, partially for the very reason we see here: when those > aspirations aren't met, people who interpreted them as official > commitments start complaining. > > I shouldn't have to haul out my soap box here. Have a little patience > and put this in perspective. You are not paying customers and no one > here is under any obligation to you. If you want hard delivery dates > and commitments, get out your checkbook and see if anyone bites. A > polite "how's that coming along" inquiry is, I would think, an > appreciated sign of community interest. But if you want to sit in the > back seat and yell "are we there yet" at the drivers, either accept > that "soon" is a valid answer or, if you're lucky enough to get > something more precise, understand that it's somebody sticking their > neck out trying to be helpful. > > Go back to enjoying your free lunches. When dessert arrives, it will > be announced. > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:43 AM, Gugas<carlos.mfa.mart...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Not to defend dependency on the plugin, but the fact is that gwt > > coders keep saying that it will be out very shortly and this has kept > > a good number of us hanging. > > I understand that the realease has been delayed because quality comes > > first, as it should, but it would show a bit more professionalism if > > gwt stopped making announcements for "the end of the week" and only > > come up with a date when they are sure of it. > > Best reagrds > > > On 26 Jul, 18:54, Isaac Truett <itru...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> It certainly is unfortunate that you would be delaying your project > >> because of a single convenience plugin. I would recommend that you > >> strive for more self-sufficiency and less sense of entitlement. > > >> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 8:57 PM, SuperEva<eva.andreas...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > So...just curious...when will the plugin be ready. Some of us have > >> > been waiting over a month. It is very unfortunate the way this is > >> > delaying our project. Do you recommend we move back to 3.4 Eclipse or > >> > turn elsewhere for solutions? Or is the fix really gonna come within > >> > the next week? > > >> > Appreciate a quick response, > >> > Eva > > >> > On Jul 23, 10:35 am, Miguel Méndez <mmen...@google.com> wrote: > >> >> Don't worry. Release 1.1 of the plugin will support Eclipse 3.3, 3.4 > >> >> and > >> >> 3.5. However, we are considering deprecating support for Eclipse 3.3 > >> >> in the > >> >> 1.2 release of our plugin. > > >> >> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Yaakov <yaakov.chai...@gmail.com> > >> >> wrote: > > >> >> > Hi Rajeev, > > >> >> > You guys are still going to support the version for Eclipse 3.4, > >> >> > right? > > >> >> > I am just hoping that you guys don't forget that not everyone can be > >> >> > Google Wave and code against a constantly (and very rapidly) moving > >> >> > platform. > > >> >> > Thanks, > >> >> > Yaakov. > > >> >> > On Jul 22, 11:46 am, Rajeev Dayal <rda...@google.com> wrote: > >> >> > > Hi, > >> >> > > Yes, this has taken longer than expected, but we're now on the > >> >> > > finishing > >> >> > > touches. We should have something out there within the week. > > >> >> > > Thanks, > >> >> > > Rajeev > > >> >> > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Nik <nikcol...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> >> > > > We're now heading towards months, not weeks. > >> >> > > > Any progress? > > >> >> > > > On Jun 25, 10:17 pm, Alex Rudnick <a...@google.com> wrote: > >> >> > > > > If you enjoyed this thread, you may also like these: > >> >> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit/browse_thread/threa.. > >> >> > .. > >> >> > > > .. > > >> >> > > > > We're working on it *right now*, rest assured! > > >> >> > > > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Rob > >> >> > > > > Tanner<caspersg...@gmail.com> > >> >> > > > wrote: > >> >> > > > > > When will a version of the plugin be released for Eclipse 3.5 > >> >> > > > > > (or > >> >> > can > >> >> > > > > > I simply use the version for 3.4). I would like to use the > >> >> > > > > > new > >> >> > > > > > Eclipse, but GWT has become one of my main tools. > > >> >> > > > > > Thanks, > >> >> > > > > > Rob > > >> >> > > > > -- > >> >> > > > > Alex Rudnick > >> >> > > > > swe, gwt, atl > > >> >> -- > >> >> Miguel- Hide quoted text - > > >> >> - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---