Thank you for your input, guess you're right, I'm overly concerned with this.
I really enjoy working with GWT, I hope Google and the community keep up this good work. On Aug 7, 5:38 pm, mikedshaffer <[email protected]> wrote: > Unless you write in the native language of your application container > and remain fully versed in the variety and upgrades, you are in this > same position regardless of your choice of library/compiler/ > environment. If you write apps using Java and suddenly the complier > stopped being compatible with some future version of Windows, you'd be > forced with a rewrite. If you use JQuery as a javascript library, you > are counting on them to remain current with browser variations.. It's > really an age old problem that is best solved by looking at the > company/organization behind it (Franks point) and other attributes > (like open source, Tonys point). > > My .02 USD..... > > On Aug 7, 10:16 am, Tony <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Additionally, GWT is open-source, so if Google stopped supporting it > > the community could continue to develop the code. > > > On Aug 7, 11:13 am, Frank Stallone <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I don't think that is a real concern given the direction Google's OS > > > is going with apps seemingly being RIAs. > > > > If GWT became unpopular then yeah that be an issue but I assume that > > > means something better came along so why would you be using GWT?- Hide > > > quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
