No, maybe I didn't explain it properly. The obvious thing to me was to NOT use the Obect[][] construct, but I thought there might be some reason for doing so. You answered that as a "no". So what do you use? James
On Aug 9, 10:55 pm, Isaac Truett <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry. I thought you were looking for other solutions for handling table data. > > I can't explain why you have examples with two dimensional Object > arrays. I don't use them myself and I have not seen them advocated > under these circumstances. > > On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 12:02 PM,JamesD<[email protected]> wrote: > > > Okay, but that doesn't explain why all the code I've seen has this > > same construct for mapping column and row data: Object[][] ? Is it > > something to do with js and the compiled java code, or am I wrong and > > there really aren't any issues with any of the widgets and their > > associated events that this construct works fine in all cases and an > > more OOP approach isn't needed? > > > The person that originally brought this issue up where I work is no > > longer there, so I don't know if my original assumption is correct and > > I can't believe the google guys would throw out example code of a > > construct that really wasn't good or relevant in a working > > environment. As I said I'm still new to GWT and I don't want to waste > > time coding a solution to handle a situation to cover a potential > > problem that doesn't exist and is handled fine with the code examples > > I've seen. > > > Thanks, > > James > > > On Jul 31, 1:39 pm, Isaac Truett <[email protected]> wrote: > >> James, > > >> You might find that the PagingScrollTable in the GWT Incubator > >> projects fits your OO sensibilities a little better. Look for the one > >> in the gen2 package, not the deprecated version in widgetideas. > > >>http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit-incubator/ > > >> Hope that helps, > >> Isaac > > >> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 1:46 PM, James<[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > Hello All, > >> > I'm very new to GWT (we are using 1.6) and I'm seeing a lot of code > >> > with a two dimension object array construct for column and row data > >> > for flextables: Object[][]. I've done resultset data to jsp > >> > conversions in the past and I've always used typed column objects as a > >> > more OOP approach to structure the data versus what I'm seeing. Is > >> > this really a best practice and if not what is the preferred structure > >> > or am I wrong and this is it? > > >> > Thanks, > >> >JamesD --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
