I recall getting this error aswell.
The exception "Caused by:
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:com.google.gwt.core.client.GWTBridge"
is thrown if you try to invoke

GWTMockUtilities.disarm();
GWTMockUtilities.restore();

without having gwt-dev.jar in your classpath.




On 19 Aug, 17:52, Davis Ford <[email protected]> wrote:
> Alejandro -- when you tried it, did you not get:
>
> Caused by: 
> java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:com.google.gwt.core.client.GWTBridge
>
> If so, what GWT version are you using?
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Alejandro D. Garin<[email protected]> wrote:
> > yes david, that seems to work. Personally I still prefer to use interfaces
> > in the view rather than using Widgets.
>
> > Cheers,
>
> > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:24 PM, davis <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
> >> Here you go...try it with this:
>
> >>http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/browse/releases/1....
>
> >> import static org.easymock.classextension.EasyMock.createMock;
> >> import static org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull;
>
> >> import org.junit.After;
> >> import org.junit.Before;
> >> import org.junit.Test;
>
> >> import com.google.gwt.junit.GWTMockUtilities;
> >> import com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.TextBox;
>
> >> public class TestSomething {
>
> >>       �...@before
> >>        public void setUp() throws Exception {
> >>                GWTMockUtilities.disarm();
> >>        }
>
> >>       �...@after
> >>        public void tearDown() throws Exception {
> >>                GWTMockUtilities.restore();
> >>        }
>
> >>       �...@test
> >>        public void testThatEasyMockWorksWithTextBox() {
> >>                TextBox box = createMock(TextBox.class);
> >>                assertNotNull(box);
> >>        }
> >> }
>
> >> On Aug 19, 11:19 am, davis <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > Probably stems from the constructor doing this:
>
> >> >   /**
> >> >    * Creates an empty text box.
> >> >    */
> >> >   public TextBox() {
> >> >     this(Document.get().createTextInputElement(), "gwt-TextBox");
> >> >   }
>
> >> >http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/browse/releases/1....
>
> >> > Anyone have a mock workaround for ui elements they'd like to share?
> >> > Is there a mock framework out there for GWT ui elements?
>
> >> > On Aug 19, 11:14 am, davis <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > My fault -- I thought you were talking about something else.  It
> >> > > appears you are correct.  It looks like even easy mock class extension
> >> > > can't do it.  Somewhere in the initialization code of TextBox.class it
> >> > > calls GWT.create()...major bummer.
>
> >> > > On Aug 19, 10:59 am, "Alejandro D. Garin" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > > Hi David,
>
> >> > > > I tried your example, but I have this error:
>
> >> > > > Caused by: java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: ERROR:
> >> > > > GWT.create() is
> >> > > > only usable in client code!  It cannot be called, for example, from
> >> > > > server
> >> > > > code.  If you are running a unit test, check that your test case
> >> > > > extends
> >> > > > GWTTestCase and that GWT.create() is not called from within an
> >> > > > initializer
> >> > > > or constructor.
>
> >> > > > Stacktrace:
>
> >> > > > java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
> >> > > >     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> >> > > >     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
> >> > > >     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown
> >> > > > Source)
> >> > > >     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
> >> > > >     at
> >> > > > net.sf.cglib.proxy.Enhancer.setCallbacksHelper(Enhancer.java:619)
> >> > > >     at
> >> > > > net.sf.cglib.proxy.Enhancer.setThreadCallbacks(Enhancer.java:612)
> >> > > >     at
> >> > > > net.sf.cglib.proxy.Enhancer.registerCallbacks(Enhancer.java:581)
> >> > > >     at
>
> >> > > > org.easymock.classextension.internal.ClassProxyFactory.createProxy(ClassPro
> >> > > >  xyFactory.java:108)
> >> > > >     at
> >> > > > org.easymock.internal.MocksControl.createMock(MocksControl.java:51)
> >> > > >     at
> >> > > > org.easymock.classextension.EasyMock.createMock(EasyMock.java:46)
> >> > > >     at
> >> > > > example.publico.client.SimpleTest.testSimple(SimpleTest.java:10)
> >> > > >     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> >> > > >     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
> >> > > >     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown
> >> > > > Source)
> >> > > >     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
> >> > > >     at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:168)
> >> > > >     at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:134)
> >> > > >     at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:110)
> >> > > >     at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:128)
> >> > > >     at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:113)
> >> > > >     at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:124)
> >> > > >     at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:232)
> >> > > >     at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:227)
> >> > > >     at
>
> >> > > > org.junit.internal.runners.OldTestClassRunner.run(OldTestClassRunner.java:7
> >> > > >  6)
> >> > > >     at
>
> >> > > > org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run(JUnit4TestRe
> >> > > >  ference.java:45)
> >> > > >     at
>
> >> > > > org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:
> >> > > >  38)
> >> > > >     at
>
> >> > > > org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestR
> >> > > >  unner.java:460)
> >> > > >     at
>
> >> > > > org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestR
> >> > > >  unner.java:673)
> >> > > >     at
>
> >> > > > org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner
> >> > > >  .java:386)
> >> > > >     at
>
> >> > > > org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunne
> >> > > >  r.java:196)
> >> > > > Caused by: java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: ERROR:
> >> > > > GWT.create() is
> >> > > > only usable in client code!  It cannot be called, for example, from
> >> > > > server
> >> > > > code.  If you are running a unit test, check that your test case
> >> > > > extends
> >> > > > GWTTestCase and that GWT.create() is not called from within an
> >> > > > initializer
> >> > > > or constructor.
> >> > > >     at com.google.gwt.core.client.GWT.create(GWT.java:85)
> >> > > >     at
> >> > > > com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.UIObject.<clinit>(UIObject.java:140)
> >> > > >     ... 30 more
>
> >> > > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:09 AM, davis
> >> > > > <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> >> > > > > > If your view interface return a TextBox you can't test the
> >> > > > > > presenter with
> >> > > > > > JUnit, you will need to use GWTTestCase.
>
> >> > > > > Sure you can:
>
> >> > > > > import static org.easymock.classextension.EasyMock.*;
> >> > > > > import com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.TextBox;
>
> >> > > > > public class SomePresenterTestCase {
>
> >> > > > >   private MyPresenter presenter;
> >> > > > >   private MyView view;
>
> >> > > > >   @Test
> >> > > > >   public void testSomething() {
> >> > > > >       TextBox mockBox = createMock(TextBox.class);
> >> > > > >       MyView mockView = createMock(MyView.class);
> >> > > > >       presenter = new MyPresenter(mockView);
> >> > > > >       expect(mockView.getSomeTextBox()).andReturn(mockBox);
> >> > > > >       replay(mockView);
> >> > > > >       replay(mockBox);
> >> > > > >       TextBox box = presenter.getDisplay().getSomeTextBox();
> >> > > > >       verify(mockView);
> >> > > > >    }
> >> > > > > }
>
> --
> Zeno Consulting, Inc.
> home:http://www.zenoconsulting.biz
> blog:http://zenoconsulting.wikidot.com
> p: 248.894.4922
> f: 313.884.2977
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to