On Aug 21, 1:39 pm, Sumit Chandel <[email protected]> wrote: > You should consider reusing one module in the other, or if that's not > possible because of library incompatibilities between GWT and GWT-Ext, > switching to only one of the two solutions and creating one module that can > be compiled monolithically. That would not only correct the issue you're > facing now, but would also lead to much smaller JavaScript code and a much > snappier application.
That raises an important architecture question. In our application we are building separate GWT widgets for use on the same web page together with our existing HTML components (its a legacy app). In our case we are using the SmartGWT Tree and List widgets, each in its own div. Does each widget have to load its own copy of GWT and SmartGWT core Javascript libs or can they be downloaded once per page? My concern is that the libs are 500K each which would take some time to download if the user doesnt have broadband. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
