Hi, hmm it sounds good..
I downloaded a sample gwt project with dozer (the music store)..When I look
at the file structure, I noticed that this sample contains all mapping files
and DTOs.. Including I have to write a dozer map file..

In my own sample project I did the same putting my DTOs into the client side
directly without dozer map but it still works...

I wonder what dozer gives me as an advantage - it seems it does not
guarantee writing less config files? is it a security issue that we do not
to put DTOs in client side in dozer project?

Thanks,

Tolga






On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Dalla <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Yes, exactly.
>
> This is pretty much it:
>
> DozerBeanMapper mapper = new DozerBeanMapper();
>
> //This is a mapping from EJB to POJO
> //SimpleHeader is my POJO, purchaseOrderHeader is an instance of the
> corresponding EJB.
> SimpleHeader header = (SimpleHeader) mapper.map(purchaseOrderHeader,
> SimpleHeader.class);
>
> //Mapping from POJO back to EJB looks exactly the same
> //Here, Arrivals is the EJB, arrivaldata is an instance of the
> corresponding POJO
> Arrivals arrivals = (Arrivals) mapper.map(arrivaldata,
> Arrivals.class);
>
> So if you already have EJBs and want to use Dozer, all you have to do
> is basically make a copy of your EJB, remove all annotations
> and imports of javax.* packages, create a default no argument
> constructor, and make the new POJO implement IsSerializable.
>
> On 2 Sep, 14:19, Tolga Özdemir <[email protected]> wrote:
> > hmm.. you mean your EJB classes - your DTOs - are in serverside and by
> using
> > dozer.. you automatically translate them and use in client side, right?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Dalla <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Correct, not on the client side anyway.
> > > GWT does not emulate  javax.persistence.*, importing that package on
> > > the client side would cause errors when compiling.
> > > However you COULD use EJB3, if you keep the mappings in a separate
> > > file. But´s that´s not very flexible.
> >
> > > I use EJB3 myself on the server side, and then use Dozer to convert
> > > the EJBs to POJOs before sending them to the client.
> > > Once the objects is sent back, you convert it back to an EJB, Works
> > > like a charm so far.
> >
> > > On 2 Sep, 13:26, Tolga Özdemir <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > oh..it does mean we cannot use ejb3 yet.. right?
> >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:13 PM, David Given <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > > > tolga ozdemir wrote:
> > > > > [...]
> > > > > > Can you enlighten me wheather we could use javax.persistence.* in
> our
> > > > > > serialized DTO objects for the sake of RPC??
> >
> > > > > > can I use @Table, @Id or other annotations?
> >
> > > > > The GWT runtime ignores annotations --- they're not kept at runtime
> on
> > > > > the client. So you can pass annotated objects perfectly happily
> over
> > > the
> > > > > link and they'll work fine.
> >
> > > > > I've had good experiences using Berkeley DB JE and GWT. It's
> possible
> > > to
> > > > > query an object on the server, have Berkeley DB instantiate it for
> me,
> > > > > and then just return it directly to the client for display. So I'd
> > > > > imagine you could use something similar with javax.persistence.
> >
> > > > > The only thing you probably need to be concerned with is that if
> you
> > > > > instantiate an object on the server, pass it to the client, then
> pass
> > > it
> > > > > back to the server, you're getting a different physical object than
> the
> > > > > one you originally instantiated so the persistence layer might get
> its
> > > > > cacheing confused. (Berkeley DB doesn't seem to be bothered by
> this.)
> >
> > > > > --
> > > > > ┌─── dg@cowlark.com ─────http://www.cowlark.com─────
> > > > > │
> > > > > │ "They laughed at Newton. They laughed at Einstein. Of course,
> they
> > > > > │ also laughed at Bozo the Clown." --- Carl Sagan
> >
> > > > --
> > > > Tolga Özdemir
> >
> > > > Mobile 0 536 963 7890
> > > > MSN [email protected] Dölj citerad text -
> >
> > > > - Visa citerad text -
> >
> > --
> > Tolga Özdemir
> >
> > Mobile 0 536 963 7890
> > MSN [email protected] Dölj citerad text -
> >
> > - Visa citerad text -
> >
>


-- 
Tolga Özdemir

Mobile 0 536 963 7890
MSN [email protected]

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to