Don't the Servlets need to have a serial version ID in case the server decides to passivate them?
...or would that imply that the Servlets have 'state' (which shouldn't be the case). On Sep 3, 11:38 am, Paul Grenyer <paul.gren...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Andy<antonvonpil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Cheers. > > > Yeah, I've done that, but I was just wondering if there was a reason > > that the GWT team were suppressing it (other than to have the initial > > project be created with any warnings)? > > Have a look at the code in more detail. You'll see that it implements > an interface that has to be serializble. The server side class doesn't > need to be serializable so the warning is suppressed. > > -- > Thanks > Paul > > Paul Grenyer > e: paul.gren...@gmail.com > b: paulgrenyer.blogspot.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
