>> >> Anyone have a simple example of FlexTableBulkRenderer ? > > To be fair, that's why it's still in incubator. I'm not sure what you > mean by "simple", as that's a very subjective judgement. This is a > complex widget with a lot of tuneable features. I think a feature-rich > table widget like this is a Good Thing, but it certainly does have a > steep learning curve. > > I'm of two minds about the deprecated classes. One one hand, I'm not > sure I want to rely on a widget that has them embedded so deeply. On > the other hand, it's a useful widget. If you look closely at the > deprecated code, it's mostly about event handling; which is not a > major issue for me. If this is a deal-breaker for you, it may be worth > considering a 3rd party library. > > There are a couple of good examples. One is the scrolltabledemo in the > incubator trunk. Another is Hupa (an IMAP client/server in Apache > Labs).
Hi Jeff - thanks for the response. I figured the incubator code is as such -- i.e. take it or leave it, but I was just trying to throw out a signal to see if anyone else was using it, and if they wanted to collaborate on usage. In any event, I stuck some code in my project which uses the deprecated version of FlexTableBulkRenderer, and I have to say it is lightning @#$ing fast in both IE and FF. I'm happy with it. I looked at the new API that replaces the deprecated stuff. I stuck with the deprecated version. Regards, Davis --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
