Simple answer: No.
It might be helpful (well it would for me anyway) if you were to describe
the effect you were trying to get.

To some extent I think I understand, but I don't understand the reason for
the problem for absolute positioning.

Please don't think I'm picking on you for any reason, but sometimes it is
easier to come up with solutions if people describe the required effect
rather than 'I want a xxx which does yyy'.

It's a difficult thing to ask (and I'm probably as guilty as anyone) - if
you don't know the answer (and of course you don't or why would you be
asking) how do you know how to phrase the question? :-)

But certainly this time the quick answer is 'out of luck' because the deck
panel doesn't do that. A simple example of a situation where I can
understand the effect you want and why there are restrictions (e.g. absolute
positioning) would be handy.

That said, some b****r will probably now say 'do zzz' and I'll look like a
right pillock.

Not for the first time. ;-)

Ian

http://examples.roughian.com


2009/9/8 David Given <[email protected]>

>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Is there a widget available that acts like a DeckPanel but with all
> widgets visible simultaneously, one on top of the other?
>
> I want to be able to draw stuff underneath a semi-transparent label. All
> my various approaches so far have failed in various odd ways, mostly
> related to sizing issues. I *don't* want to use absolute positioning,
> because I don't know how big my label's going to be. I would attempt to
> copy DeckPanel's code, but as it's doing some fairly hairy things with
> raw DOM I thought I should check first.
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to