On Aug 27, 3:03 am, Christophe <[email protected]> wrote: > If I were to create a patch that followed the @ArtificialRescue > principle but with a "@ServerOnly" annotation name that was valid on a > method and submitted it, do you think it has a chance of getting > accepted ?
I don't know about the GWT development team, but I'm working on the same thing. I've got a bunch of DTOs which include some housekeeping methods used by another framework, which I use on the server side. Getting to reuse these objects on the client side would be absolutely great. I can't use them now, because they happen to include some server-only dependencies in methods. My own plan is to add a "@ServerOnly" annotation on those few methods. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
