I haven't tried it out with GIN / DI. I am 'guessing' that it won't work , but I could be wrong.
--Sri 2009/10/29 skrat <dusan.malia...@gmail.com> > > Okay, that's kind of clear. Async Package (gateway class) looks nice, > but how does it fit within Gin and DI? > > On Oct 26, 4:24 am, Sripathi Krishnan <sripathi.krish...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Maybe somebody from google will confirm this, but I doubt you are going > to > > achieve code splitting by using proxies or interfaces, or by using any > > generic parameterized approach. > > > > A piece of code will end up in split-point-1.js *only if* it is always > being > > used from within GWT.runAsync(). If a class can be used from two separate > > GWT.runAsync() method blocks, it is going to end up in the left-overs > block. > > > > Now here is my understanding of the situation (of course I may be wrong) > - > > > > - You have two instances of the class AsyncLoader, say LoaderA and > > LoaderB, with two unique providers - say ProviderA and ProviderB > > - GWTC recognizes that there will be two GWT.runAsync() blocks, which > is > > why it creates two split points > > - But it cannot guarantee that LoaderA will always get ProviderA, and > so > > it should put the code for ProviderA in split-point1.js > > - So, it knows that the entry point is not using ProviderA or > ProviderB - > > which is why it is not in the initial download fragment. But it cannot > > guarantee it will always be used from a unique code fragment, which is > why > > it ends up in the left-over fragment. > > - When you use the inline implementation, you will hard-code the > actual > > provider - and hence things will work. > > > > The only pattern that works well is Googles recommended "Async Package > > Patter". See this > > presentation< > http://dl.google.com/io/2009/pres/Th_1045_TheStoryofyourCompile-Readi...>. > > > > --Sri > > > > 2009/10/25 skrat <dusan.malia...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm trying to split my code using sort of proxies, where I reuse > > > parametrized RunAsyncCallback class. This class has basically just > > > reference to Gin Provider of the real module class. When I use this > > > for loading one module, it works perfectly, and I'm getting nice and > > > correct location of split point in report. When I use this second > > > time, loading different module proxy which uses the same > > > RunAsyncCallback class, both split points happen to be in Leftovers > > > code. Yet, split point on my proxies are still listed in report, but > > > with the same minimal (386) size. > > > > > I tried to use inline implementation of RunAsyncCallback instead, and > > > surprise! Split points worked correctly again. > > > > > Here is my parametrized RunAsyncCallback class: > > > > > class AsyncLoader implements RunAsyncCallback { > > > > > private ProjectPresenter parent; > > > private PlaceManager placeManager; > > > private Provider<? extends AbstractLabeledPresenter> real; > > > > > AsyncLoader( ProjectPresenter parent, > > > Provider<? extends AbstractLabeledPresenter> real, > > > PlaceManager placeManager ) { > > > > > this.placeManager = placeManager; > > > this.parent = parent; > > > this.real = real; > > > } > > > > > @Override > > > public void onFailure(Throwable reason) { > > > // TODO Auto-generated method stub > > > > > } > > > > > @Override > > > public void onSuccess() { > > > AbstractLabeledPresenter mod = real.get(); > > > parent.addModule( mod ); > > > > > if ( mod.hasToken( History.getToken() ) ) { > > > mod.revealDisplay(); > > > parent.show(mod); > > > placeManager.fireCurrentPlace(); > > > } > > > > > } > > > } > > > > > This is inner class defined in AbstractLabeledPresenter, that's the > > > same one I'm proxying and loading with GWT.runAsync. @Inject > > > annotation is not present because injection is done on proxy class > > > which in turn instatiates AbstractLabeledPresenter$AsyncLoader. > > > > > Not sure whether this is bug, but I can't see any linking or any other > > > rason why that code should end up in Leftovers and have empty, zero > > > size split points. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
