On 11/13/09, jay <[email protected]> wrote: > > We've been shipping our product with PagingScrollTable for the past 4 > months. We've been very happy with the widget. We've made a lot of > changes around it to get more functionality and (in our opinion) > better styling. > > We've not heard any complaints from our users about performance or > anything else (at least, nothing that wasn't *our* bug). > > jay > > On Nov 12, 2:11 pm, Open eSignForms <[email protected]> wrote: > > What are people's impressions of these widgets in production use? It > > seems I've read a lot of negative stuff about PagingScrollTable, and > > it's clear that sorting does not work, which is funny when you run > > their demo since it touts sorting, yet not a single column sorts > > correctly. > > > > I've not had a chance to play with gwtlib's PagingTable, but am a bit > > concerned the version release is 0.1.6, which sounds far from being > > production ready, and the last update was May 2, so clearly there's no > > real work effort moving it forward. So, is it really 0.1.6, or does > > it work well enough that it's really 1.0 at least? > > > > It is surprising that such tables are not part of GWT core yet. This > > is one of the most common widgets needed for most data-centric apps. > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<google-web-toolkit%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=. > > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=.
