Thanks everyone. I've voted for this issue and added my own comment. -Ryan
On Dec 1, 11:40 pm, Sripathi Krishnan <[email protected]> wrote: > A few people have already done some work on this. See this thread > -http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit/browse_thread/threa... > > You may also want to star the > issuehttp://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=3769. Helps > the > google folks to know how many people want the issue resolved. > > --Sri > > 2009/12/2 Yozons Support on Gmail <[email protected]> > > > How? We'd love to do it, but I suspect it's non-trivial, and if it is, > > then I'm sure others would like the ability since it would allow you to pass > > a server object into a client object to set some state without needing the > > method itself be part of the javascript generation. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<google-web-toolkit%[email protected]> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
