@Yozons Support GXT is not a wrapper of ExtJs. So you can not compare the current GXT version with any of the existing extJS versions.
They try to produce an almost identically looking end product (extjs vs. GXT). But the way how this is achived is technically different (and also from a functional point of view) On 26 Dez., 21:47, Yozons Support on Gmail <[email protected]> wrote: > We'll investigate GXT as well. I have to say that the licensing is more > straightforward with GXT because the free/commercial tiers are not related > to functionality in GXT versus SGWT. But if you go want OSS in a commercial > product (cheap?), you'd need to stick with LGPL of SGWT over the GPL of GXT. > > But once you go commercial licensing, GXT looks more straightforward. > > How is GXT in terms of ease of data source integration with Java backends? > > Not sure too that GXT is on version 2 while ExtJS is version 3. Does the > latest GXT include the latest of ExtJS under the hood? I suppose I can > check on their web forums for such details. > > But as a GWT developer, it makes sense to look at both if you need more > robust widgets. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
