Incorrect, SmartGWT allows both. Purchasing a license does not imply that you *must* use the closed-source server-side portion. If you use just the capabilities of SmartGWT LGPL, you can offer the LGPL licensing terms to customers that prefer it, and you can purchase a license from Isomorphic to obtain different terms for customers who do not want the LGPL license.
Several of our customers do this for precisely this reason (needing an all-OSS version of their product). On Jan 4, 3:44 pm, Open eSignForms <[email protected]> wrote: > As for SmartGWT, their LGPL product looks great and would pose no issue, but > if you want their more advanced stuff for server-side code, you'd need to go > commercial, which itself is not bad for us, but then it makes it impossible > for us to offer our code as open source -- we want to do both open source > for the open source community, but know that we have to offer commercial > licenses to our business customers who demand that their systems be allowed > to be proprietary.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
