I don't think so: the GWT compiler would find a method whose signature contains class A, hence including it again.
I'm afraid the only way is to create a Bb class, that is identical to B except it doesn't contain any reference to A. But you will ALL agree that this is quite a lame solution... On 14 Gen, 10:53, Chris Lercher <[email protected]> wrote: > Just an idea - i haven't tried it: Can you mark your field transient, > but have getters/setters with JPA annotations which read/modify the > field?
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
